REFERENCES 1. C.Q. Christol, Satellite Power Systems (SPS) International Agreements, p. 73, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC, 1978. 2. A detailed definition of the “common heritage" concept in its original application is found in the address of Ambassador Arvid Pardo to the U.N. General Assembly, UN Doc. A/6695 XXII, 1967. 3. See, for example, W.R. Hinchman, Issues in Spectrum Resource Management, in W.R. Hinchman, ed., The Future of Satellite Communications: Resource Management and the Needs of Nations, esp. pp. 52-53, The 20th Century Fund, New York, 1970. An extreme example of unscientific claims of violation of the “common heritage" principle is the recent charges by the Republic of Mexico that the U.S. Government is diverting tropical storms from their normal courses, thus depriving northwest Mexico of needed rainfall. 4. For example, according to L.P. David of PRC, Inc., the Soviet Union does not demand compliance with its own microwave radiation exposure standards domestically when its economic interests are involved, as in the construction and operation of long-distance electric transmission lines. 5. J.N. Moore, in F.T. Christy, ed., Law of the Sea: Caracas and Beyond, p. 36, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1975. 6. It is, however, vital to geographically-dispersed countries such as Indonesia, and to countries engaged in frequent coordination of large-scale military and diplomatic activities on a global basis, such as the U.S. and the Soviet Union. 7. The USSR, for example, has consciously chosen to designate both scientific and military satellites as Salyut missions, with the same basic design configuration used for both types of vehicles. Note Aviat. Week Space Technol. 109, 17, 1978. 8. A.L. Hollick and R.E. Osgood, New Era of Ocean Politics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 1974; J. P. Lester, Domestic Structures and Foreign Policy, presented to the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, March 19-21, 1980. 9. L. Brown, U.S. Radio Expansion Thwarted at World Parley, New York Times, 22 November 1979, p. C22. 10. D.E.T. Luard, International Agencies: The Emerging Framework of Interdependence, p. 317, Macmillan, London, 1977. 11. T.W. Robinson, National Interests, in J.N. Rosenar, ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy (Rev. ed.), p. 184, The Free Press, New York, 1969. 12. Table 2 is based on, but not identical to, a table provided by Robinson (Ref. 11). 13. See any of the Albanian delegation’s statements at UNCLOS Ill for examples of this extreme rhetorical approach to multilateral resource and technology negotiations. In voting behavior, Albania tends to be aligned with the Group of 77. 14. See, for example, B. Buzan, Seabed Politics, p. 227, Praeger, New York, 1976; E. Miles, in F.T. Christy, ed., Law of the Sea: Caracas and Beyond, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1975. 15. W. Levi, In J.N. Rosenau, ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy (Rev. ed.), pp. 194-195, The Free Press, New York, 1969. 16. See Ref. 15. See also M.A. Kaplan and N. DeB. Katzenbach, International Law, World Order, and Human Progress, Am. Political Sci. Rev. 53, 693-712, 1959. 17. E. Miles, in F.T. Christy, ed.. Law of the Sea: Caracas and Beyond, p. 67, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1975. 18. E.L. Richardson, Law of the Sea: A Test for the United Nations, address to the Washington Press Club, Washington, DC, March 14, 1979. 19. As quoted in the New York Times, 4 December 1979, p. D4. 20. See Ref. 17, p. 65. 21. H.A. Kissinger, International Law, World Order, and Human Progress, address to the Annual Convention of the American Bar Association, Montreal, August 11, 1975.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTU5NjU0Mg==